Thursday, September 5, 2024

Mr E.'s Hangout

The substacker Mr E. has an incredible grasp on many things and perhaps some are even important.

I take him to task not on the depth of his knowledge, which is mind boggling, but on his ultimate (but never quite stated) vantage point on them.  It is, in short, reactionary Christian.

So it's not surprising I can go over Mr. E's facts (which many are) and reach essentially the opposite conclusions.  His essays make great raw material for me, simply turned around from his viewpoint to mine.

In his incredibly lengthy two part series on The Taxil Hoax, which started with the above linked article, Mr E concludes that at the bottom of all the evil and corruption in our world is...Canaanites!  Not Jews, not Freemasons (as Taxil had claimed, but only as a hoax*), but the ones their God told Hebrews to avoid and worse...the Canaanites (by whom he means specifically the Phoenecians).

Turning this right around as I now know to do, it's easy to see who this implicates, including the Freemasons.

Though not quite like that.  The reality is that the Phoenician Canaanites, and their polysexuality, were not unique.  That kind of thing was basically the norm, I would think, since before history.  Mr E likes to show that Phoenicians were everywhere (even the Americas) spreading their evil doctrines, but the likelihood is quite the reverse, that the polysexuality Mr E so denigrates was basically everywhere to begin with.

The revolution against that polysexuality actually started in ancient Iran (Persia was what the Greeks called it) with Zoroaster.  Monotheism.

Hence the (myth of?) Abraham, and the Abrahamic traditions (Judaism, Christianity, and Islam) which preoccupy over half of the world's population, and others who are dominated by them.

Jews picked that up from the Iranians who released them from captivity, and the greater Iranian culture their second temple was built within (and funded by).

In the Jewish version (copied by later Abrahamics) the Jews and their ways were favored by God over the wicked "amoral" (polysexual and polytheistic) Canaanites (actually kind of representative of most peoples...prior to the Abrahamic religions), so the Israelites easily conquered and eliminated them.

That's the tradition Mr E follows in, probably as a reactionary Christian of some kind.

Turning it around, monotheism and rigid (patriarchal) monogamy (elites were allowed a continuation of polygyny only) were the thought virus thrust upon the world by the self described followers of Abraham, which then made their (evil) mark because they aided in the raising of a local militia (by which the Hebrews may have conquered Canaanite cities), then ultimately imperial expansion and control in the west and middle east, ultimately leading to today's problems.  (Actually, a long standing thesis of mine, but also supported by Mr E's facts simply turning his vantage point upside down.)


*There continue to be believers in Taxil's works on Freemasonry.  When he announced that it was all a hoax, the audience was enraged, and police escorted him out.  He moved away from Paris and died a decade later.  It all makes me wonder...was he blackmailed into giving this "confession"?  Why else would he have done it?


Tuesday, August 13, 2024

Abraham was not Indigenous

There are a thousand reasons why the claim that (Zionist by definition) Jews can genocide Palestinians is because Jews are the true indigenous people, who were illegally kicked out by the Romans, and the Palestinians are some kind of squatter (depending on the Zionist story, perhaps only since the first pronoucements of Zionism), is wrong.

Perhaps it's unimporant, but I'd call it Reason 0:  The Foundational Myth Says Otherwise

The foundational myth of Judaism is the story of Abraham, who was a man from the City of Ur in modern Iraq.  According to this story, God promised land to Abraham's descendants.  Some time later the story continues that Hebrews, acting with the power of God, conquered a region in the central Levant and created the Kingdoms of Israel and Judah.

The foundational myth says clearly that Hebrews were Not Indigenous.  They were invaders who were promised this land (later revoked, btw) and took it with force.

Now, the main problem from a non-religious perspective is that there is no evidence any of this happened.  There is no evidence Canaan was taken by force by a family from Ur, with the original people there wiped out, etc.  The genetic evidence is that Palestinians, Jews, Samaritans, and others are all decended from Canaanites (but Jews much less so...).

I think this pretty much rules out the 'heroic' battles in which the true indigenous people were wiped out.  Those never happened.  

But what could have happened is this: A family from Ur with some peculiar religious ideas settled in the area and largely won over the region with something other than violence, likely including economic and ultimately religious ties.

The're no evidence, but it's not disproven either.  It's not disproveable.  It's not really in the realm of science.  That one family from Ur migrated to the southern central Levant and his descendants "took over" in the Iron Age.  This was the area between the Canaanite Phoenician cities and Egypt.   The Phoenician empire was concentrated in now Lebanese cities, and the southern Levant had many different tribes of different origins, but was largely originally Canaanite also (as was Jerusalem, named for the Canaanite goddess of Night and Peace...Canaanites were polytheistic in a wide way having gods for everything...we actually don't know much about the Hebrew religion except there were a few gods and one specifically for Abraham's decendants...monotheism was cribbed from Zoroastrianism when the Persian King Cyrus freed Jews from Babylonian captivity).

Since most Zionists are religious (Christian or Jewish) it would seem they should accept the existence of Abraham from Ur and that he was not indigenous.*  And even secular Jews should acknowledge it.

*Maybe it wasn't even Ur, but the basic idea was that it was somewhere else, meaning that the spiritual founder was not indigenous.  This is a religion not about being indigenous...it is about social (!!!) conquering.  It should be noted that the remaining Torah and Talmud explicitly oppose the human creation of a Jewish State also.  The Talmud sagely says the human attempt will produce antisemitism.  God alone must do that in the end times.  It takes a lot of bending to get around that (not to mention the violation of many other laws including murder and theft which the creation of a state always requires) and chutzpah that God will be fine with not waiting.  I'm an atheist, but I'd be afraid of all that.  I don't wantonly squash bugs in the yard either.  I don't want to tempt the darkness.  You never know when it's all going to blow back.




We Are the Baddies

https://www.craigmurray.org.uk/archives/2024/08/we-are-the-bad-guys/