Very Deep Left
Monday, March 18, 2024
Zionism in a nutshell
Sunday, March 17, 2024
Beheaded Babies Atrocity Propaganda
Tireless researcher zei_squirrel show the two journalists who originally disseminated the beheded babies atrocity propaganda did so, with many referencing their "findings" but few keeping up with later debunkings.
People I know still believe this and repeat it.
In fact, the truth, as reported in Haaretz, is that just one baby was killed on October 7, and it was not beheaded.
It was apparently killed in crossfire.
And I also don't understand the morality that sees the beheading of babies as greater abomination than carpet bombing their prison enclave into oblivion and starving them for months, resulting (as of this writing) in 12,300 child deaths known so far.
Was Mossad a/the key player in JFK assassination
The case for the key role of Mossad in JFK assassination is very well presented here.
This was apparently also the conclusion reached by Piper in a series of JFK Assassination theory books. Piper is one of the most well known JFK conspiracy researchers.
I like the theory presented because it explains the role of Oswald and E Howard Hunt, which fits one of my long held ideas. That Oswald was supposed to carry out a "fake" assassination (which would fail), Oswald would be shuttled out of the country, and it would be blamed on Cuba and the Soviet Union, giving reason for more aggressive action against both.
But unbeknownst to Oswald at first, a real assassination was being set up at the same time. When the assassination actually happened, Oswald had figured he had been set up as the patsy. (I suspect he may have figured it out earlier when something like this happened: his promised contacts at the Book Depository didn't show up.) After the assassination he tried to make the connections which were supposed to get him out of the country, but instead he was framed for an earlier murder of a policeman and arrested.
Another lady who may have had a very close relationship with LBJ was Mary Meyer Pinchot, the wife of Cord Meyer. (She may have been closer than another lady I recently mentioned in an earlier post.)
Friday, March 15, 2024
Social Media in China
China does not ban any social media companies because of their country of origin.
What China does is block all social media that does not comply with Chinese law.
1) China requires data about Chinese people be kept in servers in China. Facebook and Twitter have refused to do this. TikTok does this for American users by having servers in Texas ("Project Texas").
2) China requires social media companies to cooperate with Chinese law enforcement. Facebook and Twitter cooperate with US law enforcement, but they have refused to cooperate with Chinese law enforcement.
After the platforms of US social media companies were used to organize terrorist attacks in Xinjiang in 2009, 200 people died. Facebook and Twitter refused to cooperate with Chinese investigators.
3) China has certain content restrictions, as in almost every other country, though there is somewhat more restriction in China than in USA. For example, China does not permit porn. Facebook and Twitter have refused to cooperate with Chinese content restrictions.
The Chinese domestic version of TikTok, called Douin, enforces these restrictions. TikTok which is intended for other countries does not.
TikTok has already gone above and beyond US legal requirements, but the US government simply does not want a social media company owned by China, as it cannot be pressured by actors associated with the USA, including Israel, to make editorial decisions those actors want.
(Many Zionists including ADL have been complaining about all the information about Palestine that young people get on TikTok. And unlike with US social media companies, Israel can't drag the owners of TikTok to Israel to kiss the rock and the ring of Netanyahu.)
It's also pretty clear that US operates it's social media companies as international spyware and for organizing coups and terror. When the US complains about China doing these things, it is projection.
Thursday, March 14, 2024
Wednesday, March 13, 2024
Second Wave "Feminists" were Zionists and Imperialists
Tony Greenstein names the Zionist Imperialist "feminists":
Betty Friedan
Letty Pogrebin
Andrea Dworkin
Quoting Tony:
Radical feminism has always given cover to imperialism, be it in Ireland or Palestine so we shouldn’t be surprised. The darlings of American feminists – Betty Friedan, Letty Pogrebin and Andrea Dworkin – were all Zionists. American feminism has until recently, and under the pressure of Black Lives Matter and third world women, been a bastion of support for imperialist ventures. For example Susan Nossel. former head of Amnesty USA justified the Afghan war with feminist arguments.
Feminism as a western movement has, by its very nature, viewed society as primarily divided into men and women. Race and class has been largely absent from Western feminist narratives and it is no accident that the racist trollops of Brighton Women Centre have come to dominate the women’s movement and feminism.
Western feminists such as Betty Friedan fought hard against Palestinian demands for liberation and in practice what was called second wave feminism ended up in the right-wing feminism of the ‘Blair babes’ who voted overwhelmingly in Parliament for the Iraq War in 2003.
The election of 100 Labour Women MPs in 1997 resulted in a situation where 25% of women MPs (mostly old-style socialists like Alice Mahon) voted against the war compared to 40% of male MPs. So much for the sexist idea that women are more peaceful.
In more recent years it has been female Zionist MPs such as Margaret Hodge, Louise Ellman, Luciana Berger and Ruth Smeeth who led the ‘anti-Semitism’ fight against Jeremy Corbyn and the left in the Labour Party.
Further underlining the fact that women are not necessarily more 'peaceful,' here in USA we have such figures as Hillary Clinton, Victoria Nuland, and Nicky Haley.