A good telling of the story.
The author is also one who mentions the Rothschilds here and there. I'm warming to that angle, among other things they are not only dedicated Zionists they were there at the start of the project...the Balfour Letter was addressed to Lord Rothschild, and it was an agreement written somewhat to satisfy him (if not exactly as he would have it, since it needed to be negotiated, with the most devout Jews in government opposing it entirely). The Zionist project was understood by then to ultimately involve vast military expenditure...hence more money for banks and arms dealers.
However I don't think they are unique.
It also continues to show you can't trust big media, including public media.
The antiwar media is generally the most trustworthy. Like most in my sidebar, including my favorite ConsortiumNews. I don't recall Parry or any of the other columnists ever singling out the Rothschilds.
Certainly LBJ was part of it, and he was not the first militarist US President but he was possibly the first Zionist US president.Many cite his determined coverup of the USS Liberty (and not to mention not backing it up, etc). However that may not be the best example.
Zionists claim LBJ worked against them, however there's a detailed record that suggests otherwise.
One of the key issues was that JFK was determined to terminate the Israeli construction of nuclear weapons. Johnson coming to power quickly ended that.
Curiously in my own life, a half-Irish-American best friend of mine left for the bay area in 1963, and my new friend, whom I met upon returning from a month in hospital for pneumonia (which curiously struck the night after I had my first bad TV crush...on seeing Sharon Tate on her first appearance show on the Beverly Hillbillies), and my new friend (and many later best friends for decades) was Jewish, and by other coincidences, a fan of Sharon Tate later from seeing her vampire movie, and then later who started exiting my life immediately after her murder.
The switchover in my best friends occurred a few weeks BEFORE the assassination. It may be just coincidence, but it concurs with my guess that something was already afoot in intelligence circles, and it involved Jews (Zionists) and Israel. And the murder of Sharon Tate was a government involved conspiracy too, except perhaps involving Republican Zionist militarists in the deep state replacing the previous Democratic ones.
The Tate murder was the night of long knives in USA, the beginning of the end of the dominance of liberal culture. It sealed the fate of LSD which had only recently been made illegal but was still considered hip. Kids and their parents I knew were using it. Not uncoincidentally both Tate and Manson were users of LSD, but otherwise on different ideological sides, with Manson being the strong anti-government conservative, Tate being the Robert Kennedy supporting liberal. I'm sure the murder was a psyop involving the deep state and especially J Edgar Hoover, and possibly also helped to cover up details of the RFK murder that Tate may have had, that also disappeared that night.
The author is also one who mentions the Rothschilds here and there. I'm warming to that angle, among other things they are not only dedicated Zionists they were there at the start of the project...the Balfour Letter was addressed to Lord Rothschild, and it was an agreement written somewhat to satisfy him (if not exactly as he would have it, since it needed to be negotiated, with the most devout Jews in government opposing it entirely). The Zionist project was understood by then to ultimately involve vast military expenditure...hence more money for banks and arms dealers.
However I don't think they are unique.
It also continues to show you can't trust big media, including public media.
The antiwar media is generally the most trustworthy. Like most in my sidebar, including my favorite ConsortiumNews. I don't recall Parry or any of the other columnists ever singling out the Rothschilds.
Certainly LBJ was part of it, and he was not the first militarist US President but he was possibly the first Zionist US president.Many cite his determined coverup of the USS Liberty (and not to mention not backing it up, etc). However that may not be the best example.
Zionists claim LBJ worked against them, however there's a detailed record that suggests otherwise.
One of the key issues was that JFK was determined to terminate the Israeli construction of nuclear weapons. Johnson coming to power quickly ended that.
Curiously in my own life, a half-Irish-American best friend of mine left for the bay area in 1963, and my new friend, whom I met upon returning from a month in hospital for pneumonia (which curiously struck the night after I had my first bad TV crush...on seeing Sharon Tate on her first appearance show on the Beverly Hillbillies), and my new friend (and many later best friends for decades) was Jewish, and by other coincidences, a fan of Sharon Tate later from seeing her vampire movie, and then later who started exiting my life immediately after her murder.
The switchover in my best friends occurred a few weeks BEFORE the assassination. It may be just coincidence, but it concurs with my guess that something was already afoot in intelligence circles, and it involved Jews (Zionists) and Israel. And the murder of Sharon Tate was a government involved conspiracy too, except perhaps involving Republican Zionist militarists in the deep state replacing the previous Democratic ones.
The Tate murder was the night of long knives in USA, the beginning of the end of the dominance of liberal culture. It sealed the fate of LSD which had only recently been made illegal but was still considered hip. Kids and their parents I knew were using it. Not uncoincidentally both Tate and Manson were users of LSD, but otherwise on different ideological sides, with Manson being the strong anti-government conservative, Tate being the Robert Kennedy supporting liberal. I'm sure the murder was a psyop involving the deep state and especially J Edgar Hoover, and possibly also helped to cover up details of the RFK murder that Tate may have had, that also disappeared that night.
No comments:
Post a Comment