And for good reason. We don't discount human lives lost.
But Israel's brutal Protective Edge assault on Gaza has destroyed far more homes than lives. Something like 10,000 homes so far.
So here we have Jewish Efficiency, as contrasted with the Nazi version of Efficiency in which the number of lives lost were maximized.
(This is not to deny the deliberate inefficiencies either…shooting down children on the beach and so on. Still, in a War (which this hardly is), more homes than lives lost is at one end of the spectrum.)
(This is not to deny the deliberate inefficiencies either…shooting down children on the beach and so on. Still, in a War (which this hardly is), more homes than lives lost is at one end of the spectrum.)
If the end achieved is genocide and dispossession, that matters more than the means. We are not supposed to say this either.
But is it genocide yet? Have the Zionists and Israeli's killed enough for us to call this genocide?
What's their ultimate vision? It's at best the total dispossession of a national homeland for the originals and the destruction of their society. Social genocide.
And, incidentally, lives will continue to be lost until resistance is crushed.
It's at minimum an intent to commit genocide if necessary and likely. Therefore: Intent to commit genocide, while struggling to convince oneself one is not doing this, is just as much intent to commit genocide. The failure of people to resist the theft of their homeland is not to be presumed in determining one's innocence.
It's certainly more genocidal in character than South African Apartheid.
So Genocide is a pretty high bar for moral inequity, and Israel/US are at least at Intent. There are many others huge crimes already committed and being committed by Israel/US.
It's certainly more genocidal in character than South African Apartheid.
So Genocide is a pretty high bar for moral inequity, and Israel/US are at least at Intent. There are many others huge crimes already committed and being committed by Israel/US.
No comments:
Post a Comment