Monday, December 23, 2019

All Smoke Is Not The Same

I hear this from many, "Smoke is Smoke."  It is so wrong.

Tobacco smoke is especially harmful in many ways.  Including the highly addictive properties (it is far more addictive than even cocaine) which ultimately demand continuous usage.

Tobacco is a very fussy needy plant and requires intensive fertilization, and some say the best fertilizer for marijuana comes from mines and is slightly radioactive, and some of that radioactivity gets into the product.

Marijuana need only be grown in plain soil.  It's a weed that grows anywhere without assistance.  It can be grown completely organically--completely free of toxic "nutrients."  Marijuana smoke is not physically habituating and works best when very little is used infrequently.

Jack Herer claimed in his famous book "The Emperor Has No Clothes" that no one had ever died from smoking marijuana.  Most lifetime well known users like Jack Herer did not die from lung disease.  A famously big eater and endless high risk performer, it's a wonder Jack Herer lived as long as he did.  A friend of mine who was always immensely overweight and diabetic died from complications of diabetes when he was over 70, again, a wonder he lived that long.  Some studies have shown smoking marijuana to be associated with longer lives, even better job performance and fewer fatal accidents.

One thing is certain, when tobacco smoke gets into electronics, houses, cars, whatever, it never gets out.  It sticks like glue so well it often cannot even be washed away.  I have not been able to remove the smell from electronic circuit boards and I'm not even sure what removes it.

Marijuana smoke dissipates, does not stick to electronics, houses, cars, whatever.  You may smell it in the air far away for awhile then it is 100% gone.  Where it does stick to metal and glass in the actual pipe (iterfaces which are far cooler than the smoke surface so causing condensation) hardenend marijuana smoke can be removed by fruit acids similar to those in the body--the kind the body basically runs on.  Cannabinoid byproducts circulate endlessly BECAUSE they don't stick to anything.  Slowly the liver pulls them out.

Due to chemical affinities, tobacco smoke especially sticks to the lungs.  Marijuana smoke is the reverse: it does not stick to the lungs, it needs to be held in.  One qualification: Marijuana smoke DOES stick to the throat.  It can quickly become irritable to the throat, and could lead to throat disorders if improper use continues.  Proper smoking technique and quantity will avoid this issue.

I say the bottom line is what is the overall result.  Even if marijuana were harmful in itself (which has never been proven fairly sticking to the usage I describe below) that harm might be offset by reducing other harmful behaviors and/or effects.  (Sadly, it is true that tobacco, a very harmful and addictive drug, is a gateway to marijuana, and there are many who have used both marijuana and tobacco, as I did for 15 years of early adulthood.  If anything the marijuana may have spared me from greater tobacco use, and I knew very well which one I liked better.  I kept using tobacco because whenever I stopped my life became intolerable quickly.  OTOH, I smoked marijuana because it made me feel better, better than I had before I started using marijuana.)

But the possibility exists, that Marijuana used properly (as I will describe below) is not only by itself not harmful to the lungs and other organs, it is actually (as some studies have shown) life extending overall because:

1) Smoke is not "just smoke."  Different smokes are entirely different in their tendency to stick to biological surfaces and affect their operation.  And they are also biologically cleaned and degraded in different ways.  Smoke is just particulates.  We are constantly exposed to particulates and particulates vary widely, and the lung is designed to deal with particulates of many kinds pretty well (though, not so well for tobacco smoke and mineral dusts).

2) With some smokes, you become addicted to constantly use the substance, as with Tobacco.  A desireable Marijuana effect is usually achieved with very limited use...excess use does not enhance the experience.

3) Marijuana smoking, done properly, is exercise for the lungs and chest muscles.

4) The downstream influences may have either beneficial or harmful effects.  With tobacco, the downstream processes are harmful to normal body operation.  With proper marijuana use, the downsteam processes have negligible effects on the body, and operate mainly through the mind.  Whether the mind is enhanced or retarded is a matter of perspective, and other influences.

5) Cannabinoids may have cancer retarding and other biologically beneficial effects.

6) Marijuana is mentally soothing (reducing anxiety, stress, and depression--three major causes of illness) and can reduce addiction to more harmful drugs and activities.

Proper use of marijuana is like this:

1) Not smoking all day long, but 2-5 times per day.  3 seems to be about the optimum if you have the whole day available.  If you need to go to work: then it's 2--about all you can usefully squeeze in after work.  Most of my life I've done more, regardless of knowing better, often falsely making up for days "lost" (you can't do that, only add to them).

2) Smoking the highest grade marijuana for the purpose intended, and thereby reducing the quantity of smoking required.  I think the "mental" and "energetic" supposedly THC oritented (more correctly low CBD) actually accomplish everything best in my experience.  All experience, when it comes right down to it, is in the head.

3) Smoking approximately 0.02-0.03g per occasion, very finely ground.  This is a tiny pinch which can at most cover half of a 5/8 inch screen to the depth of a few mm at the maximum.  This is smoked in 3-6 hits in a medium to small water pipe.

Alternating with hits take a drink of water or other watery beverage.  I drink sweet lime mixed with Perrier which has a mild cleansing effect on the throat.  However it also makes tooth brushing mandatory, especially if additional sweetener is used (as I used to do, but no longer, as I use sweet Nellie and Joe's Key Lime Juice which is sweet without artificial sweeteners just like freshly squeezed key limes).  I make the last glass of fluid I drink every day clear reverse osmosis filtered water (should probably be the last two glasses).

Excess smoking detracts, rather than adds, to the experience.

With lower grade, you may have to increase the numbers up to 10 fold, but usually less than 3 fold.  Most Marijuana nowadays IS very good.  It hasn't gotten enormously better since the exotic grades of the 1970's.  I was there.  What has happened is that the crap marijuana unloaded on unsuspecting newbies has gone away.  Marijuana for smoking should be made from the flowering parts of the plant, never leaves or stems.  Traditionally made from those same parts, hash is actually not as potent as the very best marijuana.

It's helpful to smoke outside if possible, beceause re-inhaling smoke increases the pickup of undesirable (IMO for most purposes) CBD type cannabinoids.  Smoking outside increases the mental effects from all breeds of marijuana in the same way that "energetic" marijuana breeds are different from high CBD "pain relief" varieties.

4) Smoke is held in as much as possible, at least for a fraction of a minute.  There is no reason to systematically exhale in any unnatural form.  It is generally harmful, and especially to the vulnerable throat, to exhale through the mouth.  It is best to smoke in through the mouth, then only exhale softly and bit by bit, through the nose.  After holding in as much as possible for awhile, gradually relax into something like normal breathing through the nose.  This minimizes the participation of the throat, and any tendency toward getting nasal congestion--which is harmful.

5) If you cough or have other symptoms, that is generally indication you are doing it wrong, have already had too much, and should quit until the next daily interval.  As a friend once said to me, "If you cough, get off."

6)  Generally, this results in bursts of smoke from the nose.  As a friend once said to me "smoke expands in the lungs."  One big inhale will produce several bursts of smoke in exhales (barely visible in most light) through the nose, gradually becoming increasingly transparent.

7) Generally there needs to be one long daily period without smoking, in order to have ordinary bowel movements.  So, if you smoke at night, wait until the bowels are cleared again before resuming smoking, such as, by late morning.  (Or, for some, after work.)  Marijuana is like opiates in this regards, but much less, and not necessarily like opiates in other ways.  It has no physical habituation. There is probably no mental habituation either, one can drop smoking for any length of time, but after awhile the axiety reduction is sorely missed.

8) Maintain exercise, diet, ,and other beneficial programs, as a matter of course.  Like wine, marijuana can help you appreciate food which is better for you (as well as the other kind).  Marijuana
makes exercise, especially outdoor exercise, more interesting.

9) Smoked properly, you can small the special sweet smell of each variety.  If you don't smell the smell anymore, it is past time to quit and you should do something other than smoke.  The smell builds up slightly in the throat to become a "taste."  The taste and smell may be part of the magic of marijuana, just as they are for fine alcohols like red wine.

10) Besides the throat, marijuana can also irritate the eyes.  The important thing is to clean below and around the lower surface of the nose, and perhaps up where the face meets the sides, as this is where the irritating parts of marijuana smoke tend to stick to the skin, and be further ejected up into the eyes.  Cleaning around the eyes may also be done, but in my experience it's best to use purified water (I have my own Reverse Osmosis source) in all such cleaning, as well as using clean cotton washcloth.

Modern high grade marijuana is the ultimate drug for humanity, just as Jack Herer said.  It hits the spot, fixing exactly what seems to be wrong with the human psyche, with less collateral damage than any other psychoactive drug.* It paradoxically adapts up or down just as needed to each person.   (Alcohol is also paradoxical like this--nominally a CNS depressant it often enlivens people who are low for awhile, while others who are too high are mellowed.)  Generally, however, marijuana reduces anxiety--our main weakness--by weakening bad thoughts and memories compared with the better ones, so you can focus on the good.  By the same token, good for depression, even schizophrenia.

Alcohol can also be used daily, such as half a glass of red wine daily, is good for health, including mental, too, and has a similar mild anxiety reducing effect, which becomes a full on blast if overdone.  Marijuana doesn't ramp up like alcohol (or physically habituate), instead, an overdose of marijuana is likely to make sleep irresistible if you are near enough to a bed.  Smoked marijuana especially is self-limiting--if you've really smoked too much you just can't get yourself to smoke anymore, depending on what else you are doing.  Then if you need to concentrate, all the fog can be instantly cleared away, but at the expense of the high.  It's messing with probability instead of necessity.

Marijuana can possibly alter your sense of time, however it doesn't  necessarily affect muscle control or reflexes as alcohol does in most people.

Some studies have shown minimal effect on driving for adults well enough experienced with both driving and with marijuana.  Insignificantly better in some ways, insignificnatly worse in others, when all other factors are controlled for.  Back in the day, I remember friends always having one for the road, not to mention smoking all the way.  However, if you are not experienced with the combination, or out of practice, or otherwise impaired, a 3 hour lag time works, best in combination with some nap time and a full washup.

If you want it do, a mild reduction in anxiety can produce "visions" or whatever, if you meditate on those sorts of things, you can get quasi hallucinations or whatever.  It takes enough effort to make in not a problem if you don't want it.  There's no need to clobber your mind so you can't prevent visions, as with LSD.  Marijuana is far safer and does it all.  (When I have more experience with LSD, I'll write a how-to, but the short guide is this--a special occasion like a nature trip with mentors works best.  LSD is far stronger than marijuana, but also less flexible and perhaps ultimately less interesting and useful.  Dumb daily use of LSD results mainly in paranoia rather than blissful glow.)

(*Many have opined the cannibis plant has co-evolved with humanity, and continues so co-evolving.  The plant seeks to be our mental ally, much as catnip seeks to be the ally of cats.)

Honestly I have not much followed these rules until recently, finally being more concerned about my health than I was before, and more discriminating.  But regardless, I do not feel any lung loss from 46 years of using marijuana at age 63.  I now walk 2 miles a day with no sweat, and I'm overweight and should have exercised more when I was younger, but I hope to be catching up with more exercise now that I am retired.

I do not trust "vaporizers" and especially chemically vaporized products.  I have never gotten the same enlivening effect from vaporized marijuana.  One just keeps on inhaling more and more vapor in the hope it will finally hit the spot but somehow it keeps missing.  There is just something magical about marijuana smoke, possibly including the CO2 and other "byproducts" of burning. Marijuana smoke just hits the spot.

Pill form THC is almost unnoticeable mentally for me, at least up to 10 mg Drabinol.  It is processed through the liver instead of going straight into the bloodstream.  By all accounts it is not good for getting high.  It gives me all the constipation without getting high.  I suspect this largely applies to edibles as well.  Marijuana smoke works not just because of one chemical, but because of many chemicals that have complex interactions.

So go ahead, smoke marijuana.  Don't listen to Nancy Reagan.  It is better to be high than low.

There has been endless propaganda and misinformation for decades against marijuana to justify the enormously costly War on Drugs, which has enriched the Prison Industrial Complex, as well and criminal organizations, all part of the evil deep state.   Anti-Marijuana "experts" are fools and shills caught up in all the propaganda who have never understood what I am describing here.

And one little piece of the endless propaganda they have deployed to justify making money by making people suffer in more ways than one is "Smoke is Smoke."

Unlike all the harder drugs, which are hard to harness, and may do lots of weird stuff before doing any good, including those you "swallow," which seems natural, but your liver might not think the drug is so natural.  Drugs are drugs--NOT.  Nevertheless, I would like to see all drugs freed from prohibition, however, which itself always has been the most harm inducing part of drug usage.

Smoke is just particles, and all particles are different.  We breath particles all the time and our respiratory system and lungs are designed to handle them.  Many particles should be avoided far better than we do (diesel smoke has been one of the worst I've experienced, but friends have been killed by illnesses caused by rock dust of various kinds--I wear a respirator whenever cutting tile or handling insulation), and we should save our lungs for the magic smoke of Marijuana, which may do far more good than harm.

Used properly, Marijuana will not make you cough.  You may cough less than most people, as a lot of coughing is nervous coughing, and you will be less nervous.  If you get a cough from marijuana you are doing it at least a little wrong.

If you are properly using only Marijuana, and still coughing, check for a lung infection, such as mycoplasma (a degraded almost virus-like category of bacteria).  I have picked that up several times (typically from people who smoke both tobacco and marijuana).  Such a cough persists for weeks after incubation whether you continue smoking marijuana or not.  For me it goes away with a regimen of Augmentin, I need that because of many previous infections I have had treated (mostly oral infections resulting from inadequate oral hygene), in others it may recede with a less intense penicillin derivative.  Mycoplasma infections seem amazingly widespread in USA, perhaps aided by the fact there is litte financial incentive for drug companies or providers to fix them--they are easily fixed with one short course of antibiotics.  Untreated mycoplasma infections can lead to COPD or Lung Cancer.  It may well be that many tobacco smokers die from from the effect of such infections rather than from the direct effects of the tobacco itself.  Fortunately, I have had excellent primary physicians who have correctly diagnosed and prescribed adequate treatments for minor lung infections.  But I can imagine people with more tenuous relationship to their physicians who might never get such treatment because minor illnesses are often not seen as "important" even when minor illnesses might be the cause of major illnesses.  I don't have to imagine very hard, because I've known people with "healthcare" identical to mine who clearly weren't getting treated for lung infections which in turn infected me.  Meanwhile, such people might well talk about all the expensive specialists they were seeing.  It's a sick, sick world, and that's a big part of why we need marijuana.  Peace must begin from within.

Friday, December 13, 2019

another correct prediction

I predicted last week (in my perhaps ill conceived weak support for Impeachment) that the senate trial would not go deep because neither side wants to upset the Deep State (which they are both part of).

Indeed, that is what MoonOfAlabama is now reporting, a deal has been made between Pelosi and Senate Republicans for a quick up-or-down vote in the Senate.  No CIA rocks will be turned over.

Once again, who runs the USA?

Thursday, December 12, 2019

Unions vs Medicare for All ???

Another common theme among my MSNBC-watching centrist Democrat friends is that they don't believe union members support Medicare for All.  They give personal stories of union-family friends (are these stories or stories of stories?) who got million dollar treatments they don't believe they would have gotten from Medicare for All.  (How many people get such treatments anyway?  I tend to believe that such things are uncommon, and when people tell such stories they are most likely not talking about themselves but what they themselves have heard on the corporate media.)

The truth is at least as hard to nail down as such stories.  Some unions support M4A, others don't, and the same is true of union members, with some members of some unions opposing their union's stance.
As an example, AFL-CIO in both Texas and Massachusetts have endorsed Medicare for all, but national AFL-CIO has not taken a position.

Labor for Single Payer (not itself a union) claims that 19 unions that represent 10 million workers have endorsed Medicare for All, and that this means more than half of union members in USA are members of unions that have endorsed Medicare for All.  This is certainly true for American Federation of Teachers (I have verified that) and probably the rest.  The list includes:

  • Amalgamated Transit Union
  • American Federation of Teachers
  • American Federation of Government Employees
  • American Postal Workers Union
  • Association of Flight Attendants
  • Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way Employes/IBT
  • International Alliance of Theatrical Stage Employees
  • International Association of Machinists
  • International Federation of Professional and Technical Engineers
  • International Longshore and Warehouse Union
  • Massachusetts Nurses Association
  • National Education Association
  • National Nurses United
  • National Union of Healthcare Workers
  • NY State Nurses Association
  • PA Association of Staff Nurses and Allied Professionals
  • Service Employees International Union
  • United Automobile Workers
  • United Electrical Workers
  • United Mine Workers of America
  • Utility Workers Union of America

Impeachment Distraction

Already I'm thinking of reversing my weakly pro-Impeachment stance, as it's already clear it's a huge distraction.

On the very day the Articles of Impeachment were passed, the House also endorsed NAFTA 2.0 and it looks like the new "Defense" authorization Trump requested is going to pass.

From what I've seen, the Impeachment drone got 99% of the airtime (even though, even my most pro-Impeachment friends do not believe Trump will be removed from office anyway because the Senate won't convict), and there was hardly any mention of the other issues on Mainstream Media.

Of course, it's likely Mainstream Media would have just found something else to talk about (like Russiagate) if there weren't an Impeachment.

It's very clear corporatocracy-promoting outlets like MSNBC are using obsessive Impeachment! ranting (often bringing back the old disproven Russiagate themes) as something like Impeachment-Washing the rest of their corporate agenda.

All of my friends believe in virtually all of the debunked or widely exaggerated Russiagate claims.  Russia has become the #1 concernt of many people it seems.  And Impeachment-Washing means there will never be the closer examination the false narrative deserves.  Anything that takes the wrong side will be dismissed as RussiaBots or TrumpBots.  This is a lost generation for sure.

Sunday, December 8, 2019

Recognizing Regimes

"recognizing" new regimes is a massive form of imperial influence over the self-determination of other countries.

Valid leadership should be determined by world authority, UN, and we should follow that.

Tuesday, December 3, 2019

Ulghurs

[Correction Update: Grayzone and others have presented evidence that the story of the Ughurs is greatly misrepresented in western media.  There is not a million people incarcerated because of religious persecution.  It is more like a small group of hardened violent separatists who are in re-education.  I will update this essay when I have digested this evidence which is new to me.]


https://bridge.georgetown.edu/research/what-you-need-to-know-about-chinas-campaign-against-uighur-muslims/

I could point out many parallels in the US, starting with the locking up of over a million non-violent drug users--people who have not caused harm except, by their own preference, and possibly in less degree than many other legal things, to themselves.  By principles I subscribe to, such behavior should not be made criminal.  But "Illegal Drug Use" is a forbidden religion in the USA.

Some things about the Chinese re-education of Ulghurs might make more sense than the War on Drugs in the USA and other countries--which makes no sense.

Both phenomenon, however, fundamentally result from illiberalism.  Nowadays, it seems even antiwar opinionators are apt to cite the (desireable) end of liberalism in this same sense, but as a virtue.  This has especially caught on among some anti-Imperial tendencies, and is wrong if the context is civil liberties, such as freedom of speech, religion, and so on, as already well stated by international human rights declarations that many countries have agreed to on paper.

If the context is "economic" liberties, then yes, such liberties should in many cases be restricted or not exist.  I don't actually recognize the existence of "economic" liberties.  As far as I'm concerned, there is no inherent right for citizens to move wealth from one country to another, or do business with or in other countries, or have patents or copyrights universally respected, and so on.  Countries may centrally determine such things collectively for the benefit of all their citizens, and then citizens are obliged to follow those rules, avoiding certain kinds of transactions, or paying certain kinds of taxes.

I'm also totally opposed to violence because of higher prices, higher taxes, or even lower pay.  Demonstrations may be warranted but not violence.


Now back to Civil Liberties.

it's true, a state has an actual responsibility to promote true civic virtue.  But this needs be promoted through love and opportunity, not oppression.  Taking the opposite approach creates a Police State, as is now playing in the USA and China and most other places.

An example of love would be free anonymous drug treatment.  Of course the solution to most drugs is to regulate and tax them, and also provide anonymous free treatment for those that want it.

Examples of opportunity are: free education, guaranteed jobs, national healthcare.

We could begin on this project right away by electing Bernie Sanders.






The Guardian

In a recent editorial, The Guardian concludes by telling us politics no longer ends at the water's edge.

To which I had this reply:

Which century are they living in?  1300?

All you need to know about The Guardian is that they have been pushing the "Anti-Zionism equals Anti-Semitism" charges against Corbyn for over 5 years now.  They push all the other fake news Russiagate, etc, stories too.  They've pushed all the smears against Assange.

They are at least 80% as much a "liberal internationalist" war monger as NYTimes, and some say they are worse.

However, they do take the good side on Bolivia:


Because of their take on Bolivia, I'm only rating them as 80% as much war monger as NYTimes, but that's probably being too nice to them.

Sunday, December 1, 2019

Why is US Propaganda More Effective

1) The US government spends more money on political influence than anyone else by orders of magnitude.

Essentially the entire US "intelligence" and foreign service is a giant Influence operation, not limited to the explicit propaganda funded through NED, USAID, and VOA--which are themselves huge also.  The total funding for these agencies and operations is divided up in various ways to hide it, but $62.8 Billion is visibly allocated for the "National Intelligence Program," and $21.5 Billion is allocated for the Military Intelligence Program, for  a total of $81.5 Billion spent on explicit and openly funded "Intelligence" operations.  Meanwhile, the State Department and USAID receive a total of $31.3 Billion.

This influence is not spread worldwide evenly, though there is wide coverage, it's focussed on some spots with laser intensity.  Whole areas of the world we know we might as well write off, but we keep trying everywhere.


2) The US private sphere spends more on influence than anyone else also.

The mainstream media itself is owned by the richest plutocrats, and serves their interests first.  Add all the lobbyists, PR agencies, think tanks, NGO's, etc, all a giant influence operation.  There's influence in the ads and influence in the content and the ads also affect the content.  Add to this all the levels of education where there are rich donors--they don't do that for nothing, but sway the direction of teaching and research.

Bottom line: we have more richer people, and they spend more money on influence of endless kinds.

The money available to US media and influence operations means it can be slicker than anything else, and, at least to the US trained audience, this makes it more real.  And what really makes it stick is having a wide range of apparent differences in outlook, such as both Neocon and Progressive NGO's, which are nevertheless contained to the sphere of acceptable opinion with regards to the continuing expansion of US influence.


3) History.  While other countries have been utterly changed in the last 200 years, the US has remained a functional republic, or so it seems, for over 200 years, with only a short disruption 160 years ago.  Success and stability have bred and entrenched the mind control aristocracy (the OhSoSocial Class, which includes secretive tribes such as Skull and Bones and the like at every elite university).  Germany and Russia have been turned upside down several times in the past 200 years, so the mind control aristocracy is less pervasive and facile.  Also, an emphasis on speculative finance has led to greater entrenchment of the mind control aristocracy, in the hands of finance spooks like Allen Dulles who had an immense impact on US history but were rarely known in their day.  A long uninterrupted history means that our most powerful totalitarian and epitome of the Deep State, J Edgar Hoover--whose career started with breaking up leftist groups and kept that theme throughout--remained in power longer than Joseph Stalin and had immense permanent influence that continues to this day, in the prohibition of Marijuana, the weak and small (if finally growing) US Left, and the near elimination (and now slow recovery) of the US Labor Movement, as well as the continuing influence of organized crime (which he nutured and protected) and far right (which he was part of).


4) Foreign Allies don't question US propaganda not necessarily because they believe it, but because they depend on it also.  Every US client state wants US to be their investor and customer, we have more money to spend, and we are the savior of oppressive client regimes especially by supporting them in various ways.  Nobody in the loop wants to halt the gravy train, even though they may secretly distrust or despise us, but talking the talk and walking the walk long enough, it ultimately sinks in there also, and in the case of UK we're the continuation of their former empire of misinformation and war and their current partner in the new one.


5) The US population has long been bred and trained to be as stupid as rocks.

We've had it easy--relatively free of danger of military attack or political upheaval--and lived in an extensive, diverse, and uninterrupted system of highly funded full spectrum mind control all our lives.  The whole training is not to think much about anything political, but to have endless diversions instead, diverting time and money to still more commercial influence seeking interests, which fund the aforementioned media establishment, to keep things that way.  Development and promotion of bourgeois diversions has been a US speciality, though often now partly outsourced where actual manufacturing is involved.  Meanwhile, within the US, a person is made to feel endless dangers of all kinds, not the kinds that make a person fear the US military and police state but instead the kinds that make them want to bring that military and/or police state ON even more.  The diversions created are the only way to cope with the highly programmed fears, keeping people from thinking beyond the acceptable sphere,while they hope and pray for ever greater military and police state protection from foreign and ungodly influences.

If you fit right in with the doctrinal systems, particularly in their most extreme Religious Conservative form, you are likely to have lots of kids, like the Quiverfull, and be filling them with the same mindset.  US is one of the most religious contries in the world.  If you are an ideological "outlier" (not so outlying perhaps)  like an atheist, leftist, or pacifist who questions military or police state authority, you are more likely to live and die alone in your home staring at your computer.  Especially if you are non-white, your home might well be a prison cell or street corner compared with your peers who accepted authority. And so, passive acceptance of authority is bred, as it always has been, but rarely with such efficiency.

People in other coutries have seen huge regime changes in recent history.  The cover on the war consent manufacturing system has long been blown for many if not most people.  They don't trust the media.  They don't trust the deep state.  They don't have as much money to spend on the latest coolest diversions, which cost more to them too.  They live in much greater danger of war and/or political upheaval, and so they pay attention to politics as if their lives depends on it.  Far fewer people are in prison, and population growth hasn't favored the extremely religious quite as much.

Here in USA, it seems 40% hope the Deep State will save them from Trump (as-if-they-would), and many notables have said so explicity.  Many take umbrage at Trump for suggesting the US Media is Fake News (which of course it is, as described above).


6) US has to do propaganda better than anyone else.  We spend more on the military, more on wars, and have killed more people by far than any other country since 1945.  We need to keep the US population protected from thinking off script with a theatric politics that appears full spectrum, but isn't in certain critical ways, most notably the ways that protect the ongoing war machine.

Part of this need is fufilled endlessly projecting our mind control prowess onto other countries.  I recall as a toddler fearing that the Soviets were the brilliant chessmasters of evil misinformation, and that was why the whole world didn't settle down and accept US vision and benevolence.  It wasn't until my teens I realized that people in the rest of the world didn't live in caves and wear grass skirts.

(Beaney and Cecil cartoons featured a vaguely Soviet looking and sounding evil character named Honest John, one of about a million examples of such.  These have never been censored, though other stereotyped ethnicities have been.)

No existing "competitor" such as Russia, China, or Germany has such far flung military, imperial, and commercial intersts.  Throughout the previous century, Russia has been had a far more defensive posture than us.  Not long ago, their previous "country" split apart partly from our long time engineering for that to happen.  Pulling back a few lost regions that were part of Russia for over 100 years like Crimea with a referendum is nothing like our endless uninvited aggression in foreign countries like Afghanistan, Iraq, Syria, and Libya.

FAIR on Bolivia

Fairness and Accuracy in Reporting (FAIR.org) is the source I trust most, everything is fully referenced, and they have written extensively on Bolivia.

On the Coup and the Interim President



CEPR (Center for Economic Policy Research...another totally reliable source) analyzed the election results, found no evidence of fraud.  The researcher was interviewed at FAIR.org: